HiKaRu Bar: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "| Closed = ↵| Updated =" to "| Closed = No | Updated =") |
m (Text replacement - "| Area = Japantown" to "| Area = Japantown (Saigon)") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Type = Hostess Bar | | Type = Hostess Bar | ||
| Subtype = Japanese Hostess Bar | | Subtype = Japanese Hostess Bar | ||
| Area = Japantown | | Area = Japantown (Saigon) | ||
| Country = Vietnam | | Country = Vietnam | ||
| Province = | | Province = | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| place id = ChIJubCfbPUvdTER8iuRQOhtJcY | | place id = ChIJubCfbPUvdTER8iuRQOhtJcY | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Japanese Bar Promotion}} | |||
==Consensus Review== | ==Consensus Review== | ||
Amalgamating various views on the bar, we observe a rather poignant divergence in opinions. On one end, critically negative commentary speaks loudly of it being a 'scam' and 'fraud,' suggesting a vehement disapproval without any hesitation, while other assessments stand at complete propose, being heavily infused with positivity and satisfaction. | |||
Ranging from alleged dubious operations to contrasting impressions of pure enjoyment, the polarity of these opinions provides an intriguing insight into the multifaceted experience one can encounter at this venue. The venue has been painted by one visitor as a place of questionable transactions. Despite such damning disapproval, the bar hasn't been bereft of positive reviews. | |||
Commendable insights are highlighted by one reviewer which rings with a tone of complete satisfaction, suggesting that any additional, unexpected costs; though initially surprising for the uninitiated; could be akin to practices found in many eateries, where small add-ons such as water or napkins could incur charges. This altruistic persuasion can help mean that any perceived fraud, as highlighted in the negative review, can rather be perceived as an idiosyncrasy of different cultural norms and practices. | |||
The atmosphere seems to have left indelible marks on its visitors. The comparison of entrance charges to clubs, where one finds the company of cheery folks enhancing the spirit of the venue, distinctly alludes to the cheerful ambiance and energy that one could anticipate to find within its confines. | |||
Such diverge of impressions not only indicates the spectrum of experiences one can entertain but also presents a series of aspects that prospective visitors should be cognizant of. The spectrum captures an array of elements from additional charges to atmosphere, giving insight into the character of the venue. | |||
==Alcohol Prices / Menu== | ==Alcohol Prices / Menu== |
Latest revision as of 20:26, 4 January 2024
HiKaRu Bar | |
---|---|
Basics | |
Name | HiKaRu Bar |
Type | Hostess Bar |
Subtype | Japanese Hostess Bar |
Area | Japantown (Saigon) |
Country | Vietnam |
City | Ho Chi Minh City |
District | District 1 |
Address | Vietnam, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh |
Average rating | 4 |
Number of reviews | 4 |
Hostesses | |
Vibe | ?? |
Pushy | ?? |
Number of girls | ??? |
Hotness | ??? |
Age | ??? |
Playability | ??? |
Cost | |
Minimum spend | ??? |
Facility | |
Size | ?? |
Map Location | |
HiKaRu Bar is a Hostess Bar in Ho Chi Minh City in the Japantown (Saigon) area.
Consensus Review
Amalgamating various views on the bar, we observe a rather poignant divergence in opinions. On one end, critically negative commentary speaks loudly of it being a 'scam' and 'fraud,' suggesting a vehement disapproval without any hesitation, while other assessments stand at complete propose, being heavily infused with positivity and satisfaction.
Ranging from alleged dubious operations to contrasting impressions of pure enjoyment, the polarity of these opinions provides an intriguing insight into the multifaceted experience one can encounter at this venue. The venue has been painted by one visitor as a place of questionable transactions. Despite such damning disapproval, the bar hasn't been bereft of positive reviews.
Commendable insights are highlighted by one reviewer which rings with a tone of complete satisfaction, suggesting that any additional, unexpected costs; though initially surprising for the uninitiated; could be akin to practices found in many eateries, where small add-ons such as water or napkins could incur charges. This altruistic persuasion can help mean that any perceived fraud, as highlighted in the negative review, can rather be perceived as an idiosyncrasy of different cultural norms and practices.
The atmosphere seems to have left indelible marks on its visitors. The comparison of entrance charges to clubs, where one finds the company of cheery folks enhancing the spirit of the venue, distinctly alludes to the cheerful ambiance and energy that one could anticipate to find within its confines.
Such diverge of impressions not only indicates the spectrum of experiences one can entertain but also presents a series of aspects that prospective visitors should be cognizant of. The spectrum captures an array of elements from additional charges to atmosphere, giving insight into the character of the venue.